F-16IN: The best F16 yet for India

TIMES OF INDIA (Jan 17 2008)

A mistake covered up may cost the lives of a brave crew.” The message, displayed on a huge board at the assembly line of the C-130J Super Hercules aircraft at Lockheed Martin’s plant at Marietta, Georgia, stares at workers all the time, reminding them of the enormous responsibility on their shoulders.

The message could also become a marketing slogan for the leading US defence manufacturer as it looks forward to sealing a deal with India for supply of six of these military transportation planes and makes a pitch, with its upgraded F-16 fighter planes, for India’s biggest defence contract in two decades.

The contract for the supply of 126 medium multirole combat aircraft is estimated to be worth $14 billion, or Rs 55,000 crore. The Hercules deal, awaiting clearance from the Cabinet Committee on Security, would be the first direct military sale by a US company to India.

“The F-16 Fighting Falcon being offered to India has unique safety features that recover the aircraft — and save the pilot — even if the plane runs out of control,” Lockheed Martin executives told a group of Indian reporters at the F-16 production facility at Fort Worth in Texas. As the Indian Air Force grapples with an aging fleet, which has come to be known as flying coffins, the F-16’s safety features could be a USP, the executives said.

In fact, the company already has a name for the customized aircraft it intends to sell to India — F-16IN. It is also inclined to set up an assembly line in India in collaboration with Indian partners. The aircraft’s latest features, none of which are available in the version Pakistan has, include AESA (active electronically scanned array) radars, electronic warfare suites and infrared searching.

AESA gives the plane the capability to simultaneously track and destroy ground and air threats. Although supercruising, or cruising at supersonic speeds, is not being touted as one of the features of the new F-16, pilots flying the latest version say they often supercruise.

“The F-16IN is the most advanced F-16 ever,” said Chuck Artymovich, the company’s director, business development. Many in India might think Americans are fully absorbed in the Hillary, Obama or Romney campaigns but for Artymovich and his team, it’s a season of a full-time “India campaign”. Will the campaign lose momentum if the Indo-US nuclear deal falls through? Richard Kirkland, Lockheed Martin’s South Asia president, insists it won’t. “It has already got the backing of the US government and a go-ahead from the US Congress,” he says. Many in India, however, may not agree with him as they would not like to take a favourable US foreign policy for granted.

Lockheed Martin hopes to give a detailed proposal soon to the US government on the features and price of the F-16s on offer to India. The US government, in turn, will make a proposal to the Indian government offering F-16s and F-18s.
Incidentally, the F-18 Super Hornet, built by Boeing, is not to be mistaken for an upgraded version of the F-16. The Super Hornet is a supersonic carrier-based fighter aircraft and currently its only user is the US navy. The other aircraft competing for the Indian Air Force’s contract are the Russian MiG-35, the French Dassault Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon being offered by a consortium of European aerospace manufacturers and Swedish company Saab’s Gripen.

Why is Lockheed Martin not offering its new fifth-generation fighter aircraft F-35 to India? Company executives give three reasons: such an offer can be made only by the US government, manufacturing capability for the F-35 is still not adequate to meet the timeframe set by India, and the upgraded F-16 meets all the requirements put forward by the Indian government.

The F-35 Lightning II, yet to be officially rolled out, is a multirole stealth-capable strike fighter. It can
perform close air support, tactical bombing, and air-to-air combat.

In fact, the US air force is not going to acquire any more F-16s. Mass production of the F-35 is likely to begin by 2016, when it will start rolling out at the rate of one aircraft a day. “The F-35 is the fighter of the future,” company officials said, insisting that if India acquires the F-16 today, the F-35 would be its natural successor in future.

Meanwhile, the “India campaign” rolls on with even Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi being roped in. Lockheed martin executives have dug up a forgotten piece of history to emphasize the ties between the two countries. Thirty-five years ago, during the Chinese aggression, Prime Minister Nehru called up President Kennedy, who sent a fleet of Hercules aircraft to India. These aircraft stayed in India for nine months and carried troops and cargo to inaccessible areas in the Himalayas. The Herck also had two distinguished passengers — Nehru and daughter Indira.

5 Responses to “F-16IN: The best F16 yet for India”

  1. krenim Says:

    Its a cute stunt.Pay a lot now for an a/c with next to no critical tech transfer(AESA etc) and then trade that in for a made in US JSF.Sorry boy this just doesn’t cut the mustard.PAK FA all the way i.e 5th gen a/c on Su-30mki terms and conditions+no sanctions if we decide to celebrate buddha jayanti in style in Rajasthan :)

  2. PIETRO Says:

    I AGREE WITH KRENIM. I BELIEVE THAT THE AMERICANS WANT TO SELL IN YOUR COUNTRY THIS 3RD GENERATION AIRCRAFT, OF COURSE WELL EQUIPPED, THEN IT WILL BE MORE EASY FOR THEM TO SELL YOU THE EXPORT VERSION OF F 35. THEIR TACKTICS ARE KNOWN. THE SAME WAY DID WITH OTHER COUNTRIES. THE BEST WAY FOR INDIA IS TO BUY FROM RUSSIANS. THEI WILL OFFER THEIR BEST TECHNOLOGY THEY POSSES IF THEY SEE THE MONEY COMES. TECHNOLOGY THAT NO COUNTRY IN THE REGION HAS.

  3. vikas Says:

    Unless Lockheed(with permission of US govt) offers JSF F-35 to India at a good price they are practically out of this deal. Lockheed loves to be UNREASONABLY OPTIMISTIC. Even F-18 from Boeing is preferable than f-16.
    Even if JSF is to roll out later in 2016, it does not matter since as with all Indian deals there are a lot of delays and by the time they decide to buy, the year 2016 would be close. So ideally Lockheed should offer F-35 IF they want to be considered at all else kiss the deal good-bye.

  4. winglessblog Says:

    “Even F-18 from Boeing is preferable than f-16.”

    WHAT?! WHAT?! HUH?! What exactly are you talking about? The F-16 is not the most widely used jet fighter in the world for no reason!

    It’s cheap to operate (EXTREMELY IMPORTANT), and an excellent multi-role fighter. It is capable as both a dog-fighter & a bomber.

    It is the plane that has proven itself capable in combat, with a record NO RUSSIAN AIRCRAFT even comes close to. As far as I can recall very few have been downed due to airplane on airplane combat. I CANNOT, FOR THE LIFE OF ME, UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE STILL CONSIDER BUYING RUSSIAN EQUIPMENT CONSIDERING CONFLICT HISTORY… Russian technology has been trampled upon in nearly every conflict it has been fielded in. Israel used Russian planes for target practice in nearly every war; when Russian SAMS were introduced the Israelis suffered losses during Yom Kippur War but they quickly learned to adapt to this new technology as well, taking out Soviet SAMS quite easily in later conflicts… Israelis fought very capable adverseries, going against Jordanian, Egyptian, Syrian, Iraqi, Pakistani (yes, PAKISTAN sent a few pilots to the Arab nations), and even RUSSIAN (yes, the Russians sent planes, sams and some pilots… Some of these Russians were downed by the IAF) pilots. The issue was the planes! Although they were aerodynamic, maneuvarable and fast, the pilots lacked situational awareness. Pilots were uncomfortable and had to deal with a non-intuitive interface; in a field were millseconds matter this is a HUGE weakness. Americans always paid attention to comfort & intuitiveness in all their equipment for it had a direct correlation on situational awareness – allowing the pilots to concentrate on the adversary rather than having to look for a particular dial or a hard to reach lever.

    In the first Iraq war, American planes dessimated the Iraqi force in the air (how quickly we forget Saddam once had a capable army & air-force). Going back further, in Vietnam the USA suffered early losses because idiotic engineers provided them with an F4 phantom WITHOUT GUNS (only missles). As soon as the planes were retrofitted with guns & pilots were allowed more discretion in their tactics & actions, the Russian planes took their usual place, as heaps of metal on the floor of the jungles.

    Say what you will – this is the history and quite frankly – Russian equipment, especially Russian planes, have not faired all that well!

    One of the F16 strength is that it is INFINITELY UPGRADEABLE. Look at the original F16a’s and compare them with the F16I used by Isreal or any of the Block 60 configurations… To call it a 3rd generation plane is both misleading and patently false. Many in the aerotech community even question if the JSF is necessary arguing it’s only real advantage is the addition of STEALTH.

    Other new additions, including thrust vectoring & advanced radars can and have been applied to the F16 airframe (see the MATV/VISTA programs, probably cancelled to make the F35 more attactive).

    The fact of the matter: The F16 trully does meets or exceeds the needs of the VAST MAJORITY of nations…

    It’s got many ups to make it attractive over the J35 including:
    - in terms of real world capabilities, they are very close to each other
    - the F16 has been around for a long time, so simulators, training, maintenance & arnmanet programs are mature with all the kinks and best practices FIRMLY ESTABLISHED
    - F16 parts are plentiful
    - F16 is cheaper to buy & at least in the beginning, will still be cheaper to operate…

    PakFa sounds attractive but so far it’s just a pipe-dream! The claims made by Russia about the PakFa should not be taken with a GRAIN of SALT but a BUCKET! The USA has been building state-of-the-art planes with stealth capabilities since the early 70s (likely since the 60s in secret), they have been managing the massive infrastructure and programs required to deliver large numbers of these planes worldwide, they have access to the worlds best minds (because they can pay the most! if you are a gifted Russian, do you work for Sukhoi, or for Boeing who pays you 10x more)… EVEN WITH ALL THIS, IT TOOK THEM ALOT OF TIME and ALOT OF MONEY TO DEVELOP THE F22… Here comes Russia, a nation with very little money, a nation that has not roled out a brand new plane for mass-export in a very long time and it claims it can produce a similar plane for MUCH CHEAPER and IN LESS TIME?! Am I the only one that thinks these claims are suspicious?

    The PakFa may happen, but before 2020, I doubt it… Furthermore, I cannot see them having the capability or funds to setup the type of infrastructure required to deliver the amount of planes they plan to export.

  5. NJS Says:

    F-16 seems to very best in world in light weight version with AESA radar / Python 5 missiles . But F-18 is little bit superior to f-16 .

    If india need a low cost with proven multirole ,india can select f-16 IN . But to have edge with china /pak , the option is f-18, it has clear edge with other fighters. many jaws will be downed if f-18 takes on.


Leave a Reply